As part of this video, observe the official 1st space walk footage released by Russia; still commonly shown to the public in NASA documentaries, etc.

     Astronaut helmets are fastened to the suit, they cannot swivel their heads! Furthermore, watch the arm shake... it's not human! Could it truly all be lies? 

     The financial-elite desire you to believe they have ALL the answers and allow them to implore all decisions within your life. Halt the lying to your children.

      This photograph of the Son of God watching over mankind is entirely insignificant. We're mere microscopic specs in comparison to the vastness of the universe; just ask Carl Sagan, he was on a mission to eliminate God.

The Time Has Long Come but Not Gone to Consider the Plasma Universe Theory

For more on Ancient History visit Page 5 Human Origins

     Perhaps, this isn't all the work of Luciferian's

eliminating God. Seemingly, anytime a deliber-ately false claim is exposed in Astronomy, such as Star-Trails, the answer is to claim things are even further away than previously claimed.

      With our Solar System traveling through space at unthinkable speeds, not to mention, different speeds and directions from other objects like the stars, it wouldn't be feasible for stars to retain exact positions year after year. Even with a 2-dimensional background these trails wouldn't exist never-mind realistic 3-dimensional space with stars at different distances behind each-other.

 Note: There are scenarios of our Luciferian Ruling-Class utilizing NASA to eliminate God however, Project Blue Beam below is just one example. 

     A Method the Financial-Elite Ruling Class (Secret Societies, Freemasons, Zionists, Council on Foreign Relations, Tri-Lateral Commission, Rothschild Family and other International Bankers, etc.) to combat the Information Age which allows the common person to research and investigate sources with far more accuracy than before, is to engage in Disinformation Campaigns.

     Yes, companies alike Google are attempting to gain total control over the web to control the flow of information and Cable Companies have even begun regulating the total number of websites its customers can visit, which is something we MUST fight against; yet, in the meantime, a common method to confuse the public is to overflow the amount of information with much that it entirely false. (made-up).

     Allan Greer who appears above is seemingly fighting the status-quo of fake science, fake media, and a ruthless New World Order. The average citizen in the dark may actually learn something concerning how deceitful this ruling class of rich are, though, this deception Greer presents is intended for those such as ourselves, who're already aware of the evil N.W.O. in the hopes our investigations will be sidetracked by false information; perhaps if exposed as false it'll place the label of Conspiracy Nut upon us.

      Greer is a homosexual and agent of the Rockefeller family.

Masonic Goal:  Confuse the populace and install comprehension of the existence of men/women with far superior intellect who have it all figured-out.

Theory vs. Fact

      Unfortunately, what many Americans fail to apprehend is that almost every theory of Astronomy is just that - a theory. The most problematic concern I have with modern science is the constant correcting of theories or facts years after the early claim. Almost anything presented as fact, will be corrected in years to come. When referring to our universe, virtually everything is merely a theory, and people must comprehend this. When a scientist says what a Nebula is  (like the Orion Nebula)  a Star Factory where stars are born; this is simply a theory.

        More disheartening, is when these theories become implanted within schoolbooks. All across our nation are college kids being groomed for the next generational shift and they're taught an abundance of false theories which they perceive as facts; facts discovered by super-intelligent physicists, and etcetera.         ➖  S.P.

Apollo 11, the Greatest Accomplishment of Mankind, yet the video tapes were recorded over by an employee; therefore, NASA was forced to make a reenactment which has obvious signs of being made inside a studio?  ➖ Official NASA Story

What kind of rubbish is that? Anyhow, for the following mission a high priority was placed upon the footage, but unfortunately NASA says they lost it.   ➖ Are they serious?

      Cures for Cancer & Clinton's Email's

     Fox News and other outlets have millions of follower's, primarily the Baby-Boomer Generation, who listened to talk about Clinton's emails but never once thought to ask, "what information was in them?"

     The media continued mentioning these email for months, blocking-out real news they could be sharing with the public, yet they never once mentioned what she had written!

     In H. Clinton's emails were conversations with her Big-Pharma Mafia, and there blocking of a Cure for Cancer which is already regularly prescribed in Japan with positive results!

      This cure involves the Honey from a rare species of Bee's, only found in Brazil.

Problematic Issue:

      Americans must realize: The powers which control the AMA are the same people who control Pharmaceuticals. There's a trillion dollar business insuring that we continue to get diseases that require their pharmaceuticals!

       Recently, in California citizens openly protested against a planned 'large chemical  spraying' over a great stretch of land. Because of the people outside protesting, a judge ordered the spraying to be cancelled. This is an important example of 'the power of the people' which Americans must take heed to, because we're losing our Constitutional Rights and if that continues on the same pace it has since 2001, then we'll be imprisoned for protesting. The power of Protesting must be utilized more and protected from ever being taken-away from us.

                                                                                                                                                                 ➖ S.P.

Examining Modern Psychiatry

Was the Apollo 11 1969 Moon Landing. Was it Real or Faked?

       Besides the 2 quotes above by NASA employees, below details an additional 9 reasons to believe the Apollo 11 Landing in 1969 was a mere hoax by disturbed individuals to fool the public.

View the Van Allen Radiation Belt

3/21/19

NASA and other scientific frauds don't alter facts due to new

technologies but alter fact upon the exposing of their hoaxes

Titled: Theoretical Astronomy  from Lady Blount 1905

           We, the people, are taught astronomy is an exact science Therefore, let us be *certain. Copernicus computed the distance of the Sun from us to be 5,391,200 miles: Kepler reckoned it to be 12,376,800 miles; Ricciola, 27,360,000 miles; Newton said it did not matter whether we reckoned it 28 or 54 millions of miles; for he said that, either would do well; Benjamin Martin, in his Introduction to the Newtonian Philosophy, in 1754, says that its distance is between 81 and 82 millions of miles; fifty years ago, schoolboys were taught that it was just 81 millions; in Orr's Circle of the Sciences, H. Breen, Esq. says it is more than 82 and A half millions; in 1784, Thomas Dilworth says 93,726,900; modern, school-books, over which children now spend their playful energies and enfeeble their bodies, give us the distance as 95 millions of miles; Mr. Hind has stated that, positively, it is 95,298,260; and, according to a writer in the Telegraph of November the 30th, Gilliss and Gould' state that It is more than 96 millions, and Mayer more than I04.millions of miles! 00 much for "Knowledge" falsely so called. But, perhaps, it will be imagined by some fond, parent who is desirous that their children, may be educated in this very "exact science," of Astronomy,

                                                                                                 More on Great Distances and Masonic ideology at bottom of page.

Great Distances

    The heroes of the Freemason's (God haters, population haters & Satan worshipers) beginning with men like Pythagoras, and ending with Copernicus, Newman, and Einstein; removed the earth from the center of the universe and established a round earth which seems uncontroversial. Nonetheless, this ruling-class has lied to the populace concerning almost every statement they've ever claimed and this makes non-debatable events rightly debatable. Therefore, many learned men and women have recently come forward to state the absurdity of Theoretical Sciences (90% of Astronomy) as they believe most facts about even our earth have merely been told in order to eliminate God, Heaven, and our purpose of an important human-existence; while working towards an end-goal of establishing Masonic Luciferianism. Subsequently, each common sense question is responded with more and more absurd answers.

e.g.   Q: If the Earth is a spinning ball traveling billions of miles per/day, all the while keeping its exact orbit with the Sun (Additionally, the moon and hundreds of man-made satellites with the earth) (Furthermore, another 7 planets and 5 dwarf planets consisting of 181 moons which don't merely keep orbit with the sun but the exact size orbit; although, traveling in another direction to keep pace with the earth;. The moons must accomplish this feat w/the planets and the sun.). then why are the stars in the same position indefinitely?

          A: Well, they must be a minimum of  one-quadrillion miles away.   ...Does this honestly sound like truth?

           Of 'course, we have telescopes with eye-pieces (lenses) that can multiply our vision 100+X's and the stars continue to appear small. Therefore, they must be small correct? (A:) NASA says No. The reason why the stars don't appear larger is because they're thousand's of light-years away, and the reason  we know they're such great distances is because they remain small, because really the stars are unthinkably magnanimous in size. Our own sun is over 1,000 X's the earth's size and some stars are this much larger than our sun!

          See how the answers continue in their absurdity? Perchance, there's a simple

solution to this equation which doesn't require pseudo-mathematics placing

numerous unnecessary zero's at the end of each number to appear only

decipherable by genius' ..,.

         Perhaps, the stars are very small and bright....and closer than we're told.

☣

Matthew 10:25-26 KJV

25  It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household?

26  Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.

 Michael Thomas

Published on Jul 5, 2015

        NASA 1986 doomed challenger crew is still alive and well. MORE NASA and government deception. NASA has faked space walks, Earth pictures and footage, and the Deaths of Astronauts. What is to gain by this? But look at it this way, even though they faked the death of the Astronauts, and gave them all new lives, they are still alive and well, and that is a good thing.

        However the mystery behind the destruction of the space shuttle is still unresolved. Was it about money, forcing budget increase, or getting rid of a shuttle that was a piece of crap? Who knows. But it was a property crime.

     Internet photographs prove nothing by themselves but remain an important piece of the puzzle of truth. 

      When viewing pictures of Ronald McNair, his head seems to consistently be tilted in the same direction as his original 1986 Astronaut photographs. Although, this screams 'photo shop' this isn't the case for the remaining members.

     Furthermore, the recent photos of Ronald McNair are supposedly of his brother Carl McNair, but is this simply his new identity?

Really?    During the thousand year reign of the Catholic Church warfare was nonexistent in Europe when compared to the scientific era. The American Civil War produced 630,000+ deaths, a figure unthinkable to people prior to this war. As science and  weaponry grew, the World Wars produced tens-of-millions of death and the Atomic bomb forever scarred Japan. As for education: nuns were the first women to be educated within western culture and nowadays our children are not merely taught falsities but falsities on purpose under the guise of science.

          Scientific Knowledge and education through new and updated experimentalism is currently one of the greatest aspects of humanity.

           Unfortunately for the human race our ruling-class corrupts every prosperous element of human progression. The mortem of modern science has now overcame the 20th century perspective of science producing non-debatable facts published throughout school-systems and all other aspects of civilization; whereupon, Einstein was once quoted saying, "Mass reorganization. of all this is not in the interest of the Dark Cabal", meaning falsities remain indoctrinated into the minds of our populace (particularly alarming for our Youth) years after happening-upon being proven erroneous.  Whereas, resulting from this distrust in combination with the advanced scientific studies throughout the fields of Quantum Physics and Metaphysics, theosophists such as Rudolph Steiner and related philosophies and material is forcing a paradigm shift into a Spiritual beliefs and ancient practices solidifying themselves as acceptable mainstream sciences.

                                        Shaun Prario

Anti-Mainstream Science Societies of Interest:

[1]     The Creation Research Society Quarterly has been published since July, 1964.

                           Creation Matters containing popular level articles has been published bi-monthly since 1996. CRS has also published an assortment of special papers, monographs and books. Creationist publications have been criticized by scientists, such as Massimo Pigliucci,[10] as "nonsense" in their attempt to blend faith with empirical fact. Glenn R. Morton is an author of more than 20 articles published by CRS in an attempt to "solve scientific problems" of creationism.[11] Morton later left the creationist movement complaining "The reaction to the pictures, seismic data, the logic disgusted me. They were more interested in what I sounded like than in the data!".

     "The first transatlantic telephone cable, from Scotland to Newfoundland (1956). The system provided 36 telephone circuits. Similar undersea systems between Port Angeles, Wash., and Ketchikan, Alaska, and between California and Hawaii were later put into service. A 5,300-nautical-mile (9,816-kilometre) cable between Hawaii and Japan (1964) provided 128 voice circuits; the same number of circuits were provided in 1965 by a cable linking the United States and France. Newer cables use transistorized repeaters and provide even more voice circuits; some are capable of transmitting television programs."

                                           ➖ Encyclopedia Britannica

This book supplies a TON of facts and scientific evidence to support a round, flat & stationary earth.

Never Been a Real Photo!...

             Science and the Occult: Where the Twain Meet

               By David Grandy

From: https://www.theosophical.org/publications/quest-magazine/42-publications/quest-magazine/1250-science-and-the-occult-where-the-twain-meet

Originally printed in the JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2006 issue of Quest magazine.
Citation: Grandy, David. "Science and the Occult: Where the Twain Meet." Quest 94.1 (JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2006):13-17.

When I was in graduate school, one of my professors — an eminent historian of medieval science espoused in his lectures what one student affectionately tagged as "the Old Man River theory of scientific progress." The professor asserted that in his research he found no evidence of social or cultural factors impinging on the development of medieval science: driven purely by intellectual thought, the science "just kept rolling along." I suspect the professor would not have made this claim to a more sophisticated audience; although he had little patience with any attempt to explain science as nothing but a reaction to outside cultural forces, he was savvy enough to know that there is more to the story of science than just intellectual thought.

Like my professor, I enjoy science enough to see it as something truly remarkable. Perhaps, however, I am more inclined to admit that there is no clear line of demarcation between science per se and culture. Actually, this is not much of an admission: it has become a commonplace understanding among historians of science. Gone are the days that scholars of science portray it as humankind's sole instrument of truth in a confused and superstitious world. Despite this, many people still talk as if modern science is wholly distinct from and clearly superior to such traditions as alchemy, astrology, magic, Cabala, and nineteenth century Spiritualism. These movements, so this line of thought goes, have all been repudiated by science and are therefore intellectual dead ends.

This outlook is rendered problematic by historical scholarship (most of it in the last fifty years) that indicates complex and subtle interactions between now discarded beliefs and contemporary scientific principles. This is to say that scientific theories often emerge from circumstances that later may be seen as scientifically dubious. A case in point is Isaac Newton's law of universal gravity. The law, as presented in textbooks, consists of a straightforward factual statement (every body in the universe is attracted to every other with a force proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them) and a matching mathematical equation. Given only this much, students reflexively assume that Newtonian physics is a world apart from alchemy or magic. After all, there is a conciseness and clarity to the theory that is rarely found in other domains of human experience, let alone in the murky depths of alchemy. One is surprised then to learn that Newton invested much time and energy seeking to produce the Philosopher's Stone, the ultimate aim of alchemy. What is more, this quest cannot simply be written off as an intellectual dead end because it appears to have played into Newton's scientific thinking, quite possibly into his theory of gravity (Westfall 1985).

Today alchemy is considered an occult pursuit, and it is hard to imagine how it may have once figured into Newton's formulation of universal gravity. What we tend to forget, however, is that while the law can be clearly and succinctly stated, it is not altogether obvious how gravity works. Most people today, following Newton, describe it as an action-at a distance force, but this introduces difficulties—at least it did for Newton. In explaining the tides, he proposed that the moon (and the sun) reaches across apparently empty space to tug on the earth. For some of his contemporaries, however, this explanation went nowhere because it afforded no understanding of the mechanism by which gravitational forces propagate. Indeed it introduced a puzzle for anyone (like René Descartes) wishing to evacuate the cosmos of non contact forces, the like of which bespoke astrological influences and alchemical sympathies and antipathies. Newton privately summed up his misgivings in this way:

That gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of any thing else by and through which their action or force may be conveyed from one to another is to me so great an absurdity that I believe that no man who has in philosophical matters any competent faculty of thinking can ever Fall into it. (Westfall 1980)

Newton later defended his law of gravity by arguing that its validity is secured by observable phenomena—one can empirically test its predictions. However, he added, no one can discover its causes—why nature behaves this way—and in this sense only is the law "occult" (Westfall 1971). This admission speaks volumes about science (or, more generally, about the human intellect—the failing is not specific to science) and permits understanding of why occult or pseudoscientific practices often flourish side by side with science. For those who want to know the why of things or the ultimate causes, scientific theories do not quite close the explanatory circle. Arthur Schopenhauer faulted science on this score, noting that investigation of its theories recalls the experience of "somebody who unexpectedly finds himself in a group whose members systematically introduce each other as a friend or cousin, as if by doing so, they have sufficiently explained themselves; the visitor, however, though expressing pleasure with each introduction, has always the unexpressed question on his lips: "But how, the deuce, did I turn up among all these people?" (Schopenhauer 1966).

Over a hundred years ago, the young H.G. Wells, full of enthusiasm for science but sensing its limitations, stated:

Science is a match that man has just got alight. He thought he was in a room in moments of devotion, a temple and that his light would be reflected from and display walls inscribed with wonderful secrets and pillars carved with philosophical systems wrought in harmony. It is a curious sensation, now that the preliminary sputter is over and the flame burns up clear, to see his hands lit and just a glimpse of himself and the patch he stands on visible, and around him, in place of all that human comfort and beauty he had anticipated darkness still.

Wells did not mean to dismiss science; throughout the first half of the 20th century he was one of its leading advocates. He did, however, appreciate that while science has the capacity to improve human life in many ways, it also, as Wells' mentor T.H. Huxley put it, gives us a cosmos that "works through the lower nature of man, not for righteousness, but against it." In other words, a purposeless, uncaring, accidental cosmos: That is why, in Huxley's mind, science had the mandate of "building up an artificial world in the cosmos." The universe was neither congenial with nor sympathetic to humankind's interests; indeed, it had no capacity to be. As William James, a contemporary of Wells, noted at the turn of the twentieth century: "Nature has no one distinguishable ultimate tendency with which it is possible to feel a sympathy. In the vast rhythm of her processes, as the scientific mind now follows them, she appears to cancel herself."

When combined with the earlier thought that scientific explanations fail to offer ultimate answers, this consideration—that, as physicist Steven Weinberg insisted, the universe is "pointless"—makes it unsurprising that many people today, in their search for life clarifying meaning, look away from science. Of course, some scientists portray science as having religious value—thereby one reads God's Book of Nature—but since the Enlightenment this characterization has lost ground to the view that no human endeavor can publicly decide the question of God's existence or purpose. Implicit in this outlook is the positivistic intuition that science concerns the logical extraction of laws and predictive consequences from verifiable sense data. That is, science is a way of putting ourselves in a situation where hypotheses can be confirmed or rejected on the basis of procedures that keep one firmly anchored to physical facts and the unbiased analysis thereof. So disciplined, science presumably makes no unwarranted inferences or metaphysical leaps.

The positivistic outlook has now worn thin. There is, as Edwin Burtt put it in his 1920s critique of logical positivism, "no escape from metaphysics." Indeed, any escape attempt will be driven by considerations that open onto ultimately undecided issues of ontology and epistemology metaphysical considerations. Philosophically speaking, this fact blurs the line between science and the occult; historically speaking, the line has always been blurred.

Only since Newton have battle lines been drawn, for, as noted above, Newton was deeply involved in alchemy, not to mention biblical prophecy and symbolism. He believed, like Freemasons and Rosicrucian's since, that new knowledge issues up from older, larger understandings. But despite his immersion in what we now regard as occult or pseudoscientific pursuits, he spoke in a positivistic vein, implying that he had developed a method for reading the text of nature without metaphysical interpolation. Given the explanatory success of his science and the immense prestige it brought him, many came to regard Newtonian physics as a bulwark against what Freud later called "the black tide of mud . . . of occultism" (Jung 1963). This attitude, however, did not eliminate belief in the occult. For one thing, some who developed occult systems after Newton saw themselves as scientific pioneers à la Newton, and it is only in retrospect that their systems have been deemed occult. During the latter part of the eighteenth century and throughout the nineteenth century, Mesmerists conducted experiments, phrenologists subjected the human head to rigorous measurement, Spiritualists kept careful record of what occurred during seances, and all these groups invoked scientific terminology to report their findings.

What is more, many who worked in these movements had formal scientific training and a few were prominent scientists. Anton Mesmer earned his doctorate in medicine at the University of Vienna and, inspired by Newton's law of universal gravity, sought to harness a life force, putatively filling the cosmos, for healing purposes. William Crookes (discoverer of the element thalium and inventor of the Crookes tube), Oliver Lodge (knighted for his contributions to wireless telegraphy), and Arthur Russell Wallace (who independently formulated the theory of natural selection and co-announced it with Darwin) all affirmed the essential truth of Spiritualism, though they acknowledged that the movement had its share of charlatans. In their minds, Spiritualistic principles, far from contradicting science, were a welcome corrective to its bleak materialistic orientation. Moreover, the late nineteenth century discovery of X-rays and Becquerel rays (radioactivity) was taken by some as evidence of an unseen world of spirits existing just beyond the ken of our physical senses.

For many believers, Spiritualism held forth the heady prospect of demonstrating the reality of spiritual phenomena by scientific means. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, for example, depicted Spiritualism as "infinitely the most important thing in the world" because it was "the first attempt ever made in modern times to support [religious] faith by actual provable fact." This sentiment is not unlike that expressed two centuries earlier by Joseph Glanvill when he portrayed scientific investigation of demons and witches as "a kinde of America," a new frontier of knowledge" (Clark 1999). Along with fellow scientists Robert Boyle and Henry More, Glanvill studied and theorized about witchcraft in the same way he did about the possibility of the vacuum, magnetic action at a distance, and the nature of light.

In the nineteenth century, perhaps no scientific theory sparked more occult thought than organic evolution. At first glance this is surprising, for organic evolution is often misconstrued as a counterweight to the idea that humankind has a divine origin. Nevertheless, the prospect of humankind's unlimited evolutionary ascent within the cosmos fired the imagination of scientist and occultist alike. On the one hand, the evolutionary process, being blind and non teleological, does not aim for improvement or perfection, let alone anything like salvation or immortality. But on the other, theorists often could not refrain from dramatizing it. In the closing paragraph of his Origin of Species, Charles Darwin insisted that "[t]here is a grandeur in this [evolutionary] view of life," and elsewhere he portrayed nature (i.e., natural selection) as "infinitely more sagacious than man" and "all seeing" and "infinitely wise" (Young 1985). Huxley, Darwin's "bulldog," equated evolution with "the cosmic process . . . it is full of wonder, full of beauty, and, at the same time, full of pain." The pain, however, could be blunted through the exercise of visionary evolution: thanks to Darwin, humankind could now knowingly evolve and thereby outmaneuver a great deal of unnecessary hardship and catastrophe. With this thought in mind and almost as if he were gazing into a crystal ball, H.G. Wells spelled out the promise of evolutionary biology:

We are creatures of the twilight. But it is out of our race and lineage that minds will spring, that will reach back to us in our littleness to know us better than we know ourselves, and that will reach forward fearlessly to comprehend this future that defeats our eyes.

All the world is heavy with the promise of greater things, and a day will come, one day in the unending succession of days, when beings, beings who are now latent in our thoughts and hidden in our loins, shall stand upon this earth as one stands upon a footstool, and shall laugh and reach out their hands amid the stars. (Wells 1914)

Given the ease with which it could be dramatized, evolutionary biology attracted occultists. The most notorious was Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, who co founded the Theosophical Society in 1875. Her books, Isis Unveiled (1877) and The Secret Doctrine (1888), blended religion (particularly Hinduism), contemporary science, and mythology into a seamless whole and opened up unsuspected vistas on the past and future. She spoke of cosmic cycles and the evolutionary ascent of "seven root races," the fifth of which is the human race. The whole process, she emphasized, was governed by the law of karma and therefore was not, as many scientists believed, random or mindless. Curiously, Blavatsky seems not to have expected most educated people to embrace her outlook, even after giving it a scientific gloss. Occult understanding, she declared, is reserved for the few, and most scientists—Darwin himself—failed to grasp the cosmic and spiritual import of the evolutionary drama. They saw the outer, naturalistic shell of that process but ironically missed its rich inner vibrancy--life itself.

Rudolf Steiner, an erstwhile Theosophist who went on to found Anthroposophy, similarly posited an evolutionary drama of cosmic proportions. His cosmology, like Blavatsky's, is complex, even dizzying, and reiterates ancient motifs now deemed occult or superstitious. Betraying a Pythagorean fondness for certain basic numbers, Steiner talked of the seven states of consciousness, the seven life kingdoms or conditions, the four elements, the three creative functions, the ten cabalistic sephiroth, the nine angelic orders, and so on. These orders, kingdoms, functions, and elements are linked to the planets or zodiacal constellations in a vast system of evolving consciousness. Like many other occultists at the turn of the twentieth century, Steiner felt that he was pulling back the curtain on materialistic science so that all could see its spiritual context.

Given its propensity to stretch the mind and summon up hope of improved if not fully transfigured living circumstances, science finds common cause with the occult. And while science may seek to distance itself from the occult, the gap between the two will never be clearly defined. To be sure, science may be delineated by its emphasis on objectivity, empirical data, and mathematics, but these characteristics merely mark a distinctive approach to nature: they do not decide what nature ultimately is or what it means. Answering these questions entails interpretative passage beyond secure scientific understandings, and here, in the realm of interpretation, science and the occult often reestablish contact.

A contemporary case in point is quantum physics. In the last century, probably no scientific development has sparked greater occult interest than quantum physics, but it is not because quantum physics explicitly points toward occult agencies or influences. It is because quantum physics, while affording incredibly accurate predictions about atomic phenomena, challenges traditional scientific assumptions about physical reality and thereby clears a space for renewed debate about a whole spectrum of issues: the nature of light, extrasensory perception, human free will, God's omniscience, and so on. Some of these issues will be deemed occult by scientific purists, but even they cannot escape the charge that their worldview is, at some level, interpretative or metaphysical. Albert Einstein understood this principle better than most: "physical [scientific] concepts," he wrote, "are free creations of the human mind, and are not, however it may seem, uniquely determined by the external world." As long as the world remains open to pluralistic interpretation, science and the occult will enjoy uneasy companionship.
David Grandy is associate professor of philosophy at Brigham Young University. He is coauthor of Magic, Mystery, and Science: The Occult in Western Civilization (Indiana University Press, 2003). This essay originally appeared in the July/August 2004 issue of "Historically Speaking: The Bulletin of the Historical Society" (www.bu.edu/historic/hs/index.html ).

References:
Burtt, Edwin. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 1924.
Clark, Stuart Thinking with Demons: The Idea of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe. Oxford University Press, 1999.
Darwin, Charles. The Origin of Species. New York: Penguin, 1968.
Einstein, Albert and Leopold Infeld, The Evolution of Physics. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1961.
Hall, Trevor H. Sherlock Holmes and His Creator. London, England: Duckworth, 1978.
Huxley, T .H. Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays. New York: Macmillan, 1893 94.
James, William. The Variety of Religious Experience. New York: Vintage Books, 1990.
Jung, Carl. Memories, Dreams, Reflections. New York: Pantheon Books, 1963.
Schopenhauer, Arthur. Die The World As Will and Idea. F. A. Brodhaus, 1966.
Weinberg, Steven. Dreams of a Final Theory. New York: Vintage Books, 1994.
Wells, H.G. The Discovery of the Future. New York: B. W. Huebsch, 1914. (Penguin Books)
———. "The Rediscovery of the Unique," The Fortnightly Review, July 1891.
Westfall, Richard S. "The Influence of Alchemy on Newton," Jane Chance and R. O. Wells, Jr. Eds. Mapping the Cosmos. Houston, TX: Rice University Press, 1985.
———. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge University Press, 1980.
———. The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanics (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1971), 158.
Young, Robert. Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture. Cambridge University Press, 1985

      NASA once released a photo of a black sun spot which appeared to be a 3d Tunnel sinking into the sun! This obviously couldn't occur in the middle of a magnanimous fire. Therefore, why don't they ever alter their outdated claims!

   What's occurring in these black tunnels, is the intake of electricity. The Sun's powering-up and placing a 5 million year age-limit on our sun is complete childish nonsense.

          Some people will argue against the Electric model of the cosmos. They'll state things such as 'it doesn't count for Black Holes.' Well, who can prove the existence of such a bold claim as a Black Hole? Sure, NASA's recovered Infrared data & photographs of Quasars, but this information doesn't sufficiently prove the existence of Black Holes. It's not even in close proximity to the data required to prove such a claim. Nobody has ever bore-witness to a Black Hole and probably nobody ever will see one.

 Conclusion: Both sides have strong arguments but primarily those involved have performed little to none of their own research!

               Americans can be so ignorant. How can anyone argue against another without first listening to what they're claiming! It appears to me the Flat Earther's aren't merely claiming the Earth is Flat but desire arguing what ever evidence they and others can produce; without utilizing reports from NASA. It's clear the Flat Earther's disregard everything from NASA, and with the magnanimous lies told by NASA who can blame them; they have every right too. Therefore, the believers in the Globe Earth must use evidence they can produce outside of NASA and the HIGH PERCENTAGE of them cannot produce any evidence on their own....So what are they arguing? What are they laughing at? They're believing in the Globe model simply because some else has told them it exists. Now, that's fine if they choose to believe what someone claims, but if you're unable to produce your own evidence than stay-out of the debate!

Forever Remain Mindful of Technology

None of these reasons (LEFT) prove Earth is a globe

  Why?  1. We don't know if we can walk on other planets. We don't know if they're anything like the earth. 2. The flat earth theory is also a round earth theory.

The Occult by the hand of devils, highly integrated into modern sciences...